Minnesota Law Review

Note, Expanding the Role of Trade Preference Programs

Trade preference programs lower trade barriers for developing countries and open opportunities in consumer-driven markets which, in turn, increases their trade and economic growth. One example of a trade preference program in the United States is the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program that provides duty-free treatment for about 4800 products from 131 countries. Though trade preference programs do assist developing countries, the overall consensus is that they do not accomplish enough. Amidst the many problems that plague these programs, the key problems seem to be mismatched product coverage, the unreliability of the program’s existence, and the developed countries’ unawareness of the barriers facing developing countries that want to use the trade preference programs.

The Note proposes that the success of the GSP program depends on the interrelationship between the GSP office and the developing country. Only when the GSP office assumes responsibility as an agent for the developing country will this program truly aid these countries and, in turn, the global economy. These programs need more personnel so they can focus more attention on the beneficiaries to make the program more efficient and to increase its utilization. If developed countries enact the proposed solution, international trade will be closer to reaching levels of efficiency that benefit all nations through cheaper products, higher GDPs, and less economic disparity.

:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Minnesota Law Review Ranked Among Ten Most Cited Law Journals in America

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to report that it is the tenth most-cited law journal in the United States, according Washington & Lee’s recently-released 2011 law journal rankings. For more information on the announcement and the rankings, visit this link.

  • 2012 Symposium Announcement

    The Minnesota Law Review is pleased to announce that the 2012 Law Review Symposium will focus on direct democracy and the Minnesota Marriage amendment and will be held at the University of Minnesota Law School on October 26, 2012.

  • 2011 Symposium Webstreaming

    Live webstreaming for the 2011 Minnesota Law Review Symposium, Citizens United: Democracy Realized—or Defeated?, will be available at: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/minnesota-law-review-symposium-citizens-united-democracy-realized–or-defeated. Be sure to check it out!

  • Article Submission Policy Announcement

    On April 19, 2011, the Minnesota Law Review and several peer journals released a joint letter committing to give every author at least seven days to decide whether to accept any offer of publication. Eliminating “exploding offers” will improve the quality of our deliberations and the scholarship that we publish, [...]

  • Congratulations!

    Class of 2011 Excellence in Public Service Award recipient:  Steve Schmidt (vol. 95 Note & Comment Editor); and Class of 2011 Most Outstanding Contribution Award recipient:  Chelsea Brennan (vol. 95 Lead Managing Editor). Congratulations Steve and Chelsea!

Newsletter

cforms contact form by delicious:days